Kids' Meal Toys with Unhealthy Fast Food?

drgblog_Kids_Meal_Toys.jpg

Our county was the first in the nation to ban restaurants from using toy giveaways to lure kids to high-calorie, high-fat, high-sodium, high-sugar kids’ meals. Under the ban it is fine to offer toys with kids’ meals as long as the meals meet basic nutritional guidelines, such as no more than a generous 485 calories per meal and no more than 600 mg of sodium. By comparison a healthy girl age 4 to 8 years old should get about 1000 calories a day from food, usually divided into three meals plus two snacks. A nugget meal with apples slices and milk would qualify for a toy; a cheeseburger, fries, and soda would not.

I work with families at Stanford University’s Packard Children’s Hospital in Santa Clara County, where the Supervisors enacted this ban. The ban only impacts unincorporated parts of the county – which doesn’t include any actual McDonalds. The original vote enacting the ban was 3-2. The California Restaurant Association was given 90 days to come up with an alternative. The final vote takes place on May 11.

Childhood obesity is a crisis in our country, and disproportionately so among kids whose parents are less well educated. What we have done so far has not been working. Some in our county see this new measure as restrictive, invasive, and missing the point; others see it as welcome, just, educational, and liberating – supporting parents in feeding their kids how they want and protecting them from undue negative influence from corporate interests. What do you think?

My questions:

1) As parents do you think that this restricts your freedom or enhances your freedom?

2) Is this move good for children or bad for children?

4.5
 
 
 
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Comments

Anonymous's picture

You have to be joking.

Restrictions and regulations are not the answer. The problem lies with the parents/guardians. They are lazy and find a fast easy shortcut for everything. Tell your children no and make them something healthy to eat. Problem solved.
Anonymous's picture

Meaningless

3
While childhood obesity is indeed a major problem. Regulating toys in childrens' food is not going to help whatsoever. It is only going to waste legislative time. Even if such a bill is passed, hardly any children go to eat for the toys, they are merely treated as bonus. And it is almost ALWAYS the parents who are making the decision whether to go to eat in a fast food restaurant at all, and they are hardly likely to be lured in by toys. If we are really to fix this problem, we HAVE to resort to restricting fast food altogether.
Anonymous's picture

I think it's a great idea.

I think it's a great idea. But I also think that parents still need to choose wisely what they will feed their innocent children too. Sure, it sounds easy to zip through the drive-thru and pick up a chicken nugget meal, but maybe that's why the obesity rate in children keeps going up...I have personally made a choice that I will rush home after a hard day at work to cook before I will feed my children flash frozen, deep fried, unhealthyness.
Anonymous's picture

Regulating Children's Meals & Toys

5
I see absolutely nothing wrong with government regulating what corporations want to feed children. Most parents don't take the steps needed, from ignorance or laziness I don't know, and children become accustomed to high-fat, high-sodium, flavor-enhanced foods that provide very little real (not "enriched") nutrition. It seems to me this would be a lot more cost effective response than trying to change the entrenched habits and bad knowledge of millions of parents (who don't even bother taking care of themselves, btw). Educating parents doesn't go far or fast enough. I teach in some of the most economically underprivileged areas of Brooklyn, and I see parents giving their children McDonalds and the like every day, including sodas and other nutritionally empty foods. Other parents in better neighborhoods claim they are just too busy--one student ate cold "chicken" nuggets and french fries for breakfast last week, and this happens regularly. This kind of empty consumption kills kids' abilities to think and do school work, and I say we should just make those choices and "rewards" unavailable for young kids.
Anonymous's picture

toys in food

Those are both good questions with no easy answers. As a parent over 30.. Ok I am 50 and my youngest is 13 now.... I can personally say that I never made the choice of my kids food based on the toy they were getting anyway. All of my kids were pretty much ordering for themselves in resturants by the time they were 3 as well. They ordered on the basis of what they liked not on the basis of what the toy was as well. By the time they were about 6 they werent ordering off the childrens menu anymore anyway because the amount of food there was simply not enough. My youngest child to this day will not even eat french fries because he ate so many of them as a small child. (yeah I know that sounds bad, but the truth was I didnt use much baby food. they ate what I ate so french fries it was at that age.) So the short answer to the question is that I believe this is one more way for us to be "controlled" in to doing what someone has deemed the right thing regardless of what parents choose to do.
Anonymous's picture

Aw, no, no, no... First of

Aw, no, no, no... First of all, it's PARENTS who decide whether toy-aged kids eat fast food or not. Why not spend this energy educating them about nutrition instead? These parents aren't taking their kids to McDonald's because they want another annoying plastic toy that ends up at the bottom of the toy box; they're taking them there because THEY eat there. It's parents who think going through the drive-through is faster than picking up a rotisserie chicken and a salad mix at the grocery store, or any other million other healthy/quick options. It's parents who don't know better. It's parents who think their kids will only eat french fries. And it's parents who grew up on fast food themselves and have a taste for it. The solution is in fixing THOSE issues with parents, because until you do, you'll keep seeing kids at McDonald's. Second, as a parent who DOES occasionally get a Chick Fil A craving and take the kids there (especially - road trips!) I don't want the government taking away those silly little toys. The Chick Fil A ones are actually NICE - like books and little puzzles and stuff. It's MY responsibility to make sure my children eat a well-balanced, healthy diet. It's kind of offensive to think that I couldn't do that just because they get a toy in their Happy Meal. My kids eat their vegetables, and at 3 and 5 years old they KNOW fast food is junk and they can't have it very often. They could beg for a mini My Little Pony until their tongues fell off, it's not going to convince me that we're having McDonald's for dinner tonight! And I think they know it.

Reply

Anonymous's picture

Absolutely Not

I do not need the government "saving" my child from me. This law tells me that I am not sharp enough to figure out that a hamburger, fries and a Coke are not the best choice for my child. It tells me that I might be persuaded by a cheap plastic toy to feed my child this food day in and day out. It tells me that I am too stupid to figure out that my child is getting fat from eating this food day after day. Why not just have the government come in and inspect our cupboards to ensure that all children are kept safe from their parent's stupidity? Right now I have M & M's in my cupboard! Maybe someone should take them from me before I give them to my poor children! The bright colors lured me in!

Reply

Anonymous's picture

Think about it, though. You

Think about it, though. You can't speak for the whole of the population. Most likely you are living in a more fortunate and educated area. You cannot assume that everyone has the same amount of education to think about their childrens' health before buying a Happy Meal. This ban will be a less costly and more effective measure to prevent obesity in our country as opposed to educating everybody, which is essentially impossible. Plus, many parents just want to feel like a good parent by buying them a fun meal while saving money at the same time.