Why Are Women Giving Birth in the Dark?

Pop quiz: what is the most important factor determining whether a woman has a cesarean or not? How healthy she is? How big her baby is? Whether she has pregnancy complications? These all seem like reasonable answers, but the research tells a different story.

A large body of literature suggests that where a woman gives birth is one of the strongest - or even the strongest - predictors of whether she'll have a cesarean. Yes, you read that right. The same woman could walk into two different hospitals and walk out having had either a vaginal birth or abdominal surgery. The same is true with care providers. Some have high cesarean rates and others have low cesarean rates, and most of that difference has little to do with how many women in their care actually need cesareans to give birth safely.

A similar pattern emerges with other interventions and outcomes. Which care provider a woman goes to is actually the strongest predictor of whether she will have an episiotomy. Induction of labor, access to pain relief options, and access to vaginal birth after a previous cesarean also vary widely across providers and facilities. Different hospitals may also be more or less effective at promoting breastfeeding, more babies may end up in intensive care in one hospital than another, infections may be rampant in one hospital and well controlled in others, and the list goes on.

A woman can increase her chance of a safe birth by choosing a care provider and birth setting with excellent outcomes, but currently only a few states mandate that facilities publicly report such safety data. No state provides that information for individual care providers. A grassroots, mom-led movement is aiming to change that. The Birth Survey is working to obtain intervention rates at the facility level in every state and has already published the data for 9 states. The site also collects robust consumer feedback about every maternity care facility and licensed provider nationwide and makes this consumer data available to the public. Over 22,000 women have taken the survey since the project launched last year. (If you have given birth in the last two years, you can give your feedback.)

Currently, you can find out more about the safety, reliability, cost, and consumer satisfaction of a stroller or bassinet than the hospital or care provider you are going to rely on for a safe birth. Blindly choosing where and with whom to give birth is bad for the health of mothers and babies. Transparency is the missing ingredient to informed choice and safer birth.
 

0
 
 
Amy Romano
October 29, 2009
 
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Comments

C-section rates in Hungarian hospitals (2006) | Réka Morvay's picture

[...] play a large role in

[...] play a large role in the outcome of your birth. Yes, apparently, if you have a low-risk pregnancy, the biggest factor determining whether you will receive a cesarean section or an episiotomy is where..., not necessarily whether you need [...]
Cindy's picture

Amy, It's refreshing to hear

Amy, It's refreshing to hear a strong passionate advocate for healthy birthing talk about the disparity of birthing options, even based on the type of insurance! I was a doula for three family members after the birth of my son. I chose a natural childbirth, no drugs, a midwife, and a strong birthing plan supported by my caregivers. This was at Kaiser 13 years ago. It was a fabulous experience! Then my SIL asked me to help her give birth a few years later, at a different hospital less than 10 miles away from my own, in the same metropolitan area. Her birth story was successful, but only because I had to be a strong advocate for your birthing options. They were rushing her to medicate, rushing for a c-section, because it was a Friday and the doctor was going "off-shift" so if she wanted "him" to deliver, she better make some different choices. It was appalling. Of course, this was a for profit hospital -- they certainly were not making any money by having her listen to her own body. It was a mass production line, but I'm thankful I helped to educate her about her own options, and was her advocate at the most vulnerable time. But what about others? Women's Bodies, Women's Wisdom was a godsend of education for me at the time about educating me about my body, how birth works, visualization techniques and the history of giving birth. A great primer for any new mom. Thanks for info, it's inspiring and sad all at the same time. I suppose that is the human experience.
Birth Plans As Exit Signs | Perspectives...'s picture

[...] Why Are Women Giving

[...] Why Are Women Giving Birth in the Dark? [...]
janet's picture

We have exactly the same

We have exactly the same stuff in Australia. Hiring a surgeon, your own private surgeon, is the highest risk of all. Next risk is going to a hospital of any kind because there you have a team, not just one. Some private hospitals here have rates of 60-80% abdominal surgery. And of course the other massive predictor is "Did you have surgery last time?" Because in Australia 80% of those women are automatically booked into subsequent surgery and of the remaining 20%... Well what I can say is that our largest state, WA, has a 16% vbac rate. Of course that's no indication of normal physiological birth, that just means the baby came out a vagina in some way. it's likely to have been highly managed and intervened. And miraculous. At home, of course, a birth is just a birth but that's being outlawed in Australia right now. And yet we have trouble getting people to believe that surgeons do surgery. *sigh*
MsGreene's picture

Wow Amy -- those are an

Wow Amy -- those are an amazing stats ... and not amazing in a good way. Thanks for sharing and for your role in changing the status quo. C~