Pose your questions to Dr. Greene and the DrGreene.com Community on
Ask, Answer, Learn.
By volunteering to add a warning to drug labels, perhaps the drug companies hope that this will prevent the FDA from taking stronger action. With the voluntary label warnings by the drug companies, they don’t take any of their medicines off the market. The only change is that the small print that gives a dose for children age 2 to 6 will now give a dose for children 4 to 6 instead. Whatever their reasons, I don’t see this as a positive step for children’s health – but I do think it has a silver lining. Perhaps the media attention to this announcement will help people to learn that these medicines don’t work better than placebo for young kids.
When deciding about when to recommend a medication, I use something I call the Green Ratio (no ‘e’ on the end of Greene). It’s an ecological approach. The ratio is the Targeted Benefit over the Time-Tested Risk. You want the ratio to be high. If there is no proven benefit to the child, why tolerate any risk of serious side effects? On the other hand, if a remedy is gentle, with almost no risk of serious side effects, I might be willing to try something that may or may not help.
The Green Ratio for many popular over-the-counter cough and cold medicines is worst for kids under age 6, and I don’t recommend them for children under age 6.
Even for older children before puberty, I don’t see clear proof of benefit compared to a placebo for most kids. But because the risks are lower, I’m somewhat less concerned about parents trying them. Although benefit hasn’t been proven over large groups of kids, they may even work for some individual children – different people respond to medicines differently. There may be a targeted benefit for specific children.
Comments